 |
this bjturk.commentary:
a tale of two families
In the Eastern United States, there is a raging debate going on right now about Elian Gonzalez, a little boy
from Cuba whose mother tried to bring him to America. The boat in which Elian, his mother and about a
dozen others were sailing sank before it reached U.S. shores. His mother was lost. Elian, clinging to an
inner tube. was plucked from the sea by fishermen off Florida. He was the sole survivor.
Elian's parents were divorced, but Elian shared a close relationship with both parents. News reports have
shown that Elian's parents were close even after the divorce, and were both very much involved in Elian's
upbringing. His father, Elian's sole surviving parent, has requested that Elian be returned to him in Cuba.
Relatives of Elian, aunts and uncles who left Cuba long ago and in whose custody Elian is staying, are
refusing to allow this.
The United States Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) has ruled that Elian should be returned to
his father in Cuba. This has provoked vociferous protests in Miami, Florida, which has a large population of
Cuban refugees. Thousands of them have marched in protest of the INS order, and sympathetic attorneys have
filed legal actions to allow Elian to stay in the U.S. for good. Even Congress has subpoenaed Elian to
appear, which effectively blocks his return to Cuba and his father. An international tug-of-war has begun
over a little boy, pulled into the refugee arena against his will and torn between his Cuban father and
his U.S.-based aunts and uncles.
Elian's grandmothers came from Cuba five days ago to see Elian, but his aunts and uncles refused to let them
see him unless it was at their house, which they claim is now Elian's home. The INS, which retains
responsibilty for Elian, has ordered that they be allowed to visit with Elian privately at a neutral site.
The site is the home of a Catholic nun who is a college president and a friend of U.S. Attorney General
Janet Reno. The family is balking at this as well. They say that the grandmothers may only see Elian at
their home. The INS, however, appears to have the upper hand in forcing the issue.
This afternoon, Elian will reportedly have that private meeting with his grandmothers. The women are
understandably very excited, and the family is very upset. The meeting, by order of the INS, will include
only Elian, his maternal grandmother and his paternal grandmother. Nobody else. The family has agreed to
bring Elian to the site, but they will not be allowed to attend the meeting, even to observe. This will be
the first direct contact this six-year-old has had in two months.
The irony here is that the U.S. Government and that of Cuba both want to return Elian to his father in Cuba.
When was the last time that these two governments agreed on anything? Still, the battle to return Elian to
Cuba is far from over. An action in family court in Miami may strip Elian's father of his parental rights,
leaving the boy with his U.S. family. However, the INS believes that it has jurisdiction to send Elian
back and may well be able to enforce its decision. What everyone seems to overlook is that this is not a
boat, nor a picture, nor any other kind of property. This is a little boy who tragically lost his mother,
and nearly died himself. He is on the brink of losing his father as well. The fate of Elian Gonzalez is not
a choice between the U.S. and Cuba, but instead a choice between freedom and family. Which is more
important? More significantly, which is more important to a six-year-old boy?
It is through our family that we become closer to God. A nation is but a political thing, but family is
sacred. Two thousand years ago, the world was saved by a man returning to his father. Today, a family can
be saved by returning Elian to his father. I couldn't bear it if I were separated from my children like
that, and my heart goes out to Elian's father. Two months is a long time to have your only son kept from
you.
January 26, 2000
* * * * * * * * * * UPDATE * * * * * * * * * *
Five months after fishermen pulled him from the Atlantic off the Florida coast, Elian
Gonzalez went home. No, not to his family in Florida, but to his father and stepmother,
who came from Cuba to retrieve him. After months of legal wrangling by the Miami
relatives, the courts rightly found that the only one who had legal standing to act on
Elian's behalf was his father. The expiration of an appellate court stay was only a few
hours past when Elian and his father, along with several others who had also traveled
from Cuba, boarded a private jet and flew straight home to Havana.
To his credit, Cuban President Fidel Castro made no effort to keep the boy in the
spotlight, and considerable efforts were made to ensure that the Gonzalez family would
have privacy in the days following their return from the United States. To my
recollection, only once was any member of the Cuban family brought before the cameras
again, and that was so Castro could pin a medal on Juan Gonzalez, Elian's father, for
his heroic efforts to win his son back and bring pride to Cuba. After that, not another
word. I am glad of that.
Of course, I contrast this with Elian's stay in Miami. While there, he gained a great
deal of media coverage, apparently encouraged by his Miami relatives. They may have
thought that a great deal of media attention would keep the government from sending the
boy home by drawing on the sympathies of viewers. This strategy not only failed, but
failed miserably. The funny thing is that, after armed INS agents forcibly removed
Elian from the Miami home and reunited him with his father, Elian was hardly ever seen
again on camera. A few still photos were released, but there was none of the daily film
clips that peppered the evening news for months on end. Elian finally had some semblance
of privacy, though it took an armed raid and armed guards to secure it.
As much as I believe that, in the United States, Elian would have been able to reach more
of his potential than under the Castro regime in Cuba, I can't help but feel that Elian
is where he belongs, with his father. Decisions like those made by the courts in this
difficult case bolster my faith in our justice system, where even lost little boys can
obtain a just ruling. Sometimes the right thing to do isn't what we want, but it's
always the right thing to do.
updated July 11, 2000
You'll always be broke if people don't pay you attention!
Your feedback is welcomed.

just vote no
|
political charities
|
irresponsibility
|
favors make enemies
|
patriotic profiteering
arpaio, enough!
|
a royal slant
|
where are the flags?
|
role models
|
the race lost
|
9/11 + 2 years
unfinished business
|
mortal combat
|
a pledge unholy
|
america and war
|
defense ministry
pride or patriotism?
|
we still stand
|
in God we trust
|
five weeks of indecision
|
credibility counts
harry potter and the scrivener's consequence
|
father's day 2000
|
the passage of time
modern customer service
|
a tale of two families
|
how will you spend the millennial new year?
what wisdom of corporate america?
|
what about the info-dictator?
|
alternative education or ripoff?
the olympic spirit
|
is joe arpaio america's toughest sheriff?
|
re-election '98

[home] [web design and development] [writings] [stores] [about us] [donations]

copyright © 1994-2010 bjturk.communications. all rights reserved. privacy policy and legal
notices | contact the webmaster | site map
|
 |