 |
this bjturk.commentary:
political charities
When you give to disease-related charities, you expect
that money to do some good. You expect that it will go to research and the
development of cures and that lives willl be saved as a result. Let's face it:
the possibility that your dollars may make that cure possible makes you feel good.
It does for me too, and there's nothing wrong with that, but how would you feel if
that charity used those dollars for political reasons? Would you still feel so
supportive?
This has become an issue for me here in Arizona, where three major charitable
organizations have thrust themselves into a campaign to push one initiative on the
ballot and kill another. Here is the circumstance: threre are three anti-smoking
measures on this fall's ballot. One adds an eighty-cent-per-pack tax to fund
early childhood programs (misguided, but that's another story), and two separate
propositions restrict where people can smoke, with one going further than another.
It is these where the charities have come in.

The American Lung Association, the American Heart Association and the American Cancer
Society are jointly buying commercial time and putting up posters supporting
Proposition 201, which is the more restrictive. The commercials are running in
prime time, obviously expensive, and the posters are plentiful along our roadways.
You can't tell me that I'm wrong about the source of the funding because in this
state, such major donors must be listed on the posters and in the commercials, and
there they are. In fact, their famous logos appear on the posters as well so there
can be no doubt. So spent are some of our donations.
This is not to say that these charities have no right to urge the passage of the
proposal that limits smoking to a greater degree. They most certainly do. In
fact, I think that most of us would be horrified if any of these organizations
failed to announce their support of either or both issues at hand. However,
that does not mean that we would be equally thrilled to see them spending
hundreds of thousands of donated dollars, if not millions, to ensure its
approval.

To be fair, the competing measure, Proposition 206, is notably being supported by
tobacco giant R. J. Reynolds. Of the two, this would allow bar owners to permit smoking if they chose, so long as
such an area was completely separate from the non-smoking area. Clearly, RJR is
trying to protect its market to the degree they can, and no matter how you feel
about their product, one cannot argue that it is entirely proper for a business
to do what it can to ensure that people can still use its products.
It seems likely that all three measures will pass handily, but millions will have
been spent that could have kept someone from dying. That bothers me. I'm not
saying that there's nothing wrong with smoking. If there wasn't, I wouldn't have
quit earlier this year after almost thirty years of smoking a pack a day. My
problem is that these charities should not have spent donated funds on a
political campaign. Because of what I believe is a misappropriation of funds,
I am sorry to say that I cannot support them any longer. They will no longer
get anything directly from me. They have voted with their dollars, and I'm
voting with mine, for something else.
October is National Breast Cancer Awareness Month. You can support the Susan
G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation at http://www.komen.org. Whether they share with the American
Cancer Society is up to them.
October 2, 2006
You'll always be broke if people don't pay you attention!
Your feedback is welcomed.

just vote no
|
political charities
|
irresponsibility
|
favors make enemies
|
patriotic profiteering
arpaio, enough!
|
a royal slant
|
where are the flags?
|
role models
|
the race lost
|
9/11 + 2 years
unfinished business
|
mortal combat
|
a pledge unholy
|
america and war
|
defense ministry
pride or patriotism?
|
we still stand
|
in God we trust
|
five weeks of indecision
|
credibility counts
harry potter and the scrivener's consequence
|
father's day 2000
|
the passage of time
modern customer service
|
a tale of two families
|
how will you spend the millennial new year?
what wisdom of corporate america?
|
what about the info-dictator?
|
alternative education or ripoff?
the olympic spirit
|
is joe arpaio america's toughest sheriff?
|
re-election '98

[home] [web design and development] [writings] [stores] [about us] [donations]
copyright © 1994-2006 bjturk.communications. all rights reserved. privacy policy and legal
notices contact the webmaster site map
|
 |